Penile Prosthetic Surgery · Brisbane

Penile Implant Surgery Brisbane

Specialist assessment for men considering penile implant surgery for erectile dysfunction, including first-time implantation, severe or treatment-resistant ED, erectile dysfunction after prostate cancer treatment, Peyronie’s disease with erectile dysfunction and complex surgical planning after previous penile or pelvic treatment.

Inflatable & malleable implant discussion Individualised surgical planning Failed tablet or injection pathways ED after prostatectomy Peyronie’s & penile fibrosis Interstate & international pathways
Private specialist consultation regarding erectile dysfunction and penile implant treatment
Penile implant assessment Understand the ED pathway, implant designs, realistic expectations and factors that can make surgery more complex.
FRACS Urologist Australian specialist surgical training
Advanced Andrology Fellowship University College London Hospitals
Penile Prosthetic Surgery Primary & revision assessment
Brisbane Interstate & international patients
Start here

Which penile implant pathway applies to you?

Penile prosthetic surgery is not one single clinical situation. Previous treatment, erection quality, penile anatomy, curvature, scarring and previous implant surgery can substantially change the discussion.

New ED pathways

Not sure whether you are at the implant stage yet?

These focused pages sit before the implant decision and help patients navigate unsuccessful tablets, injection treatment, severe ED and persistent ED after prostate cancer treatment.

Treatment failure

ED Tablets Not Working

What to review and what treatment options may reasonably come next.

Explore →
Injection treatment

Injections Don’t Suit Me

Alternatives when injections are ineffective, poorly tolerated or impractical.

Explore →
Complex ED

Treatment-Resistant ED

Persistent erectile dysfunction despite appropriate standard treatment.

Explore →
Treatment comparison

Implant vs Injections

Compare the practical differences between repeated injection treatment and surgery.

Compare →
Understanding penile implants

What is a penile implant?

A penile implant, also called a penile prosthesis, is an implanted medical device used to provide penile rigidity for sexual activity.

The implant is placed surgically within the erectile chambers of the penis. Implant surgery may enter the discussion when significant erectile dysfunction remains problematic despite other reasonable treatment options, when those treatments are unsuitable, or when a patient prefers a surgical option after appropriate assessment and counselling.

The implant creates rigidity mechanically. It therefore does not rely on the same erectile blood-flow response required for tablets or penile injections.

  • Completely implanted within the body
  • Designed to provide mechanical penile rigidity
  • Inflatable and malleable designs are available
  • Does not require an ED tablet or injection before each sexual encounter
  • Device selection requires individual assessment
Educational illustration of a three-piece inflatable penile implant showing cylinders, pump and reservoir

Educational illustration of the principal components of a three-piece inflatable penile implant.

Simplified educational schematic. Exact component position varies with anatomy, surgical approach and previous pelvic surgery.

Device mechanics

A three-piece implant is a system, not just two cylinders

A three-piece inflatable prosthesis typically contains paired cylinders, a scrotal pump and a fluid reservoir. Each component occupies a different anatomical space and therefore presents different surgical-planning considerations.

Cylinders Positioned within the erectile chambers.
Scrotal pump Allows inflation and deflation of the system.
Reservoir Stores fluid and requires appropriate pelvic or abdominal positioning.

Previous prostate surgery, pelvic operations, hernia surgery or other altered anatomy can be relevant particularly when planning reservoir position.

Treatment planning

When might penile implant surgery be discussed?

Implant surgery is generally considered within the wider erectile dysfunction pathway rather than in isolation.

Previous ED treatment

Other options have not been satisfactory

Tablets, vacuum devices, injections or other appropriate treatments may not provide sufficient reliability, may not be tolerated or may not suit the individual patient.

ED tablets not working →
Pelvic treatment

ED after prostate or pelvic treatment

Persistent ED can occur following prostate surgery, radiotherapy and other pelvic treatment. Previous surgery can also influence implant planning.

ED after prostate cancer →
Complex ED

Diabetes, vascular disease or severe ED

Some men have significant erectile dysfunction associated with diabetes, vascular disease or other medical conditions despite appropriate non-surgical management.

Treatment-resistant ED →
Penile deformity

Peyronie’s disease with poor rigidity

When significant ED accompanies curvature, narrowing or instability, erection quality and deformity need to be considered together.

Explore Peyronie's disease →
Treatment preference

Preference for a surgical pathway

Some appropriately assessed patients prefer an implanted surgical option after understanding alternatives, limitations, risks and recovery.

When to consider an implant →
Previous surgery

Penile scarring or altered anatomy

Peyronie’s disease, previous implant surgery, priapism, infection or other penile procedures can increase operative complexity.

Previous treatment hasn't worked →

Difficulty with ED treatment does not automatically mean you need an implant.

The purpose of assessment is to clarify the cause and severity of erectile dysfunction, review previous treatment and establish whether implant surgery is a reasonable option for your circumstances.

ED treatment escalation

Where are you in the erectile dysfunction treatment pathway?

Many patients arrive at the penile implant discussion after one or more non-surgical treatments have been ineffective, unreliable, poorly tolerated or simply unsuitable.

Educational erectile dysfunction treatment pathway showing tablets, injections, vacuum treatment and penile implant
Simplified treatment pathway. Not every patient needs to progress through every stage.
Educational cross-sectional illustration of intracavernosal penile injection anatomy
Injection therapy is one of the non-surgical options that may be considered before an implant. Technique and dosing require individual clinical instruction.
Stage 01 · Tablets

ED tablets have not worked

Review common reasons for an inadequate response and which options may reasonably follow.

What happens next? →
Stage 02 · Injections

Injections do not suit you

Injections may be ineffective, painful, inconvenient, unreliable or unacceptable.

Explore alternatives →
Stage 03 · Refractory ED

ED remains severe

Persistent poor rigidity despite treatment requires broader review of cause and anatomy.

Explore severe ED →
Stage 04 · Surgery

An implant enters the discussion

Understand when a prosthesis may reasonably become part of treatment planning.

Consider an implant →
After prostate cancer treatment

Erectile dysfunction after prostatectomy has its own treatment pathway

Erectile function can change following radical prostatectomy, radiotherapy and other prostate cancer treatment. The pattern and severity of ED, time since treatment, rehabilitation already attempted and response to tablets or injections all help shape the next discussion.

01

Overview

Understand how prostate cancer treatment can affect erections.

Explore pathway →
02

Radical prostatectomy

Focused information on recovery, rehabilitation and treatment escalation.

Read more →
03

Implant pathway

Understand why previous pelvic surgery matters when planning prosthetic surgery.

Implant after prostatectomy →
Medical illustration of radical prostatectomy anatomy highlighting the prostate and neurovascular bundles

Radical prostatectomy can affect the nerve pathways involved in erections. Previous pelvic surgery is also relevant when planning a later penile implant procedure.

Common decision point

Penile implant or penile injections?

Both approaches may be used for significant erectile dysfunction, but they work very differently. Treatment choice should reflect response, practicality, medical factors and patient priorities rather than a simple ranking.

Non-surgical

Penile injection therapy

Medication is injected into the erectile tissue before sexual activity and can provide useful rigidity for some men when tablets are ineffective.

  • No implant operation required
  • Medication required for each use
  • Dose and response can vary
  • Some patients dislike needles or discomfort
  • Priapism is an important potential complication
Surgical

Penile implant

An implanted device provides mechanical rigidity and does not depend on an injection or tablet each time sexual activity is planned.

  • Requires surgery and recovery
  • Completely implanted within the body
  • Provides mechanical rigidity when used
  • Has surgical and device-related risks
  • May eventually require revision or replacement
Implant designs

Inflatable or malleable penile implant?

Neither implant design is automatically better for every patient. Anatomy, hand function, previous surgery, scarring and individual priorities can all influence the discussion.

Inflatable design

Three-piece inflatable implant

An inflatable system typically includes two implanted cylinders, a pump within the scrotum and a fluid reservoir within the pelvis or lower abdomen.

  • Inflates when rigidity is desired
  • Can be deflated when not in use
  • Requires sufficient hand function to operate
  • Reservoir planning may be affected by pelvic surgery
  • Contains additional mechanical components
Malleable design

Malleable penile implant

A malleable implant contains bendable rods positioned inside the penis. There is no scrotal inflation pump or separate fluid reservoir.

  • Simpler implanted mechanical design
  • Does not require repeated pump squeezing
  • Manually positioned for sexual activity
  • Penis remains persistently firm to some degree
  • Concealability differs from an inflatable system
Implant function

The inflatable implant uses a closed hydraulic system

Activating the scrotal pump transfers fluid from the reservoir into the cylinders. This increases cylinder volume and produces penile rigidity.

A deflation mechanism allows fluid to return to the reservoir after sexual activity.

Pump feel, the number of squeezes required and the way the device cycles vary between systems, implant sizing, individual anatomy and how fully the implant is inflated.

Realistic expectations

What does a penile implant actually change?

One of the most important parts of penile implant assessment is establishing realistic expectations before surgery.

A penile implant is principally a treatment for erectile rigidity. It should not be presented as a penile enlargement procedure, and it cannot recreate every aspect of natural erectile function.

A penile implant is designed to
  • Provide mechanical penile rigidity
  • Allow an erection to be created when desired
  • Provide a treatment option independent of tablets or injections
  • Remain completely implanted within the body
  • Provide a long-term surgical treatment pathway
A penile implant does not guarantee
  • Increased penile length or girth
  • Restoration of penile dimensions from years earlier
  • Normal glans engorgement in every patient
  • Increased sexual desire
  • Restoration of orgasm, sensation or ejaculation affected by another condition
Overlapping conditions

What if I have both Peyronie’s disease and ED?

Penile curvature and erectile dysfunction should not be treated as completely separate problems when both are present.

Good rigidity

Curvature may be the main problem

When natural erections remain reliable, management may focus more directly on penile deformity rather than implant surgery.

Poor rigidity

Straightening alone may not solve the problem

A straightening procedure does not create a stronger erection. Significant treatment-resistant ED may therefore change the surgical pathway.

Implant pathway

Rigidity and deformity can be considered together

Implant placement may improve some curvature. Additional modelling or reconstructive manoeuvres may be required in selected patients.

Educational medical illustration showing Peyronie's disease hourglass narrowing and hinge deformity

Hourglass narrowing and hinge instability can matter when erectile dysfunction and penile deformity occur together.

Dr Jack Crozier performing specialist urological surgery

Specialist urological surgical image. Individual penile implant procedures vary according to anatomy and surgical planning.

Your treatment pathway

From assessment to learning to use the implant

Exact timing and postoperative instructions vary between patients, but penile prosthetic surgery generally involves several distinct stages.

Previous radical prostate surgery, hernia surgery, Peyronie’s surgery, prior implant procedures, infection, priapism and significant fibrosis may influence component placement and operative complexity.

1

Assessment

Review the ED, previous treatment, health, medications, anatomy and priorities.

2

Planning

Discuss implant design, previous pelvic surgery, hand function, expectations and risks.

3

Surgery

Components are implanted under anaesthesia according to the surgical plan.

4

Healing

Early recovery focuses on wound care, swelling, pain and activity restrictions.

5

Activation

Once appropriately healed, patients are taught how to operate and cycle an inflatable device.

Postoperative learning

Recovery and implant activation are separate stages

Immediately after surgery, the priorities are wound healing, swelling, pain control, urinary function and detecting any unexpected postoperative problem.

Implant operation and cycling are introduced according to the postoperative plan once healing is sufficiently advanced. Exact instructions and timing vary.

  • Early wound and swelling assessment
  • Activity and lifting restrictions
  • Identification of concerning symptoms
  • Pump identification and handling
  • Inflation and deflation teaching when appropriate
  • Longer-term cycling and follow-up
The postoperative pathway changes over time
Healing first — device training later
1 2 3 4 Early healing Review Device teaching Cycling
Informed decision-making

Risks and limitations should be understood before surgery

Penile implant surgery is an operation involving an implanted medical device. Individual risks vary according to medical history, previous surgery, anatomy and the complexity of the procedure.

Infection

Infection can require additional treatment, implant removal and sometimes reconstructive or salvage surgery.

Mechanical problems

Implanted components can develop mechanical problems over time and may eventually require another operation.

Positioning problems

Pump, cylinder or reservoir position can occasionally cause discomfort or functional difficulty.

Pain & wound problems

Early discomfort and swelling are expected. Persistent pain or abnormal wound healing require assessment.

Erosion or tissue injury

Prosthesis components can threaten surrounding tissues, and urethral or other tissue injury is a recognised risk.

Expectations & appearance

Penile length, shape, glans fullness, pump position and the feel of an implanted erection may differ from expectations.

This is not an exhaustive list of surgical risks. Individual risks, anaesthetic considerations and device-specific information are discussed during consultation and formal informed consent.

Revision surgery occurs in previously operated tissue
Simplified corporal fibrosis / reimplantation concept
Scar tissue Implant space

Conceptual illustration only. Fibrosis can vary substantially after previous infection, explantation or repeated surgery.

Already have an implant?

Problems with an existing implant have their own pathway

If an implant has stopped working, become difficult to operate, changed position, become painful or developed wound or infection concerns, the priority is to establish exactly what has changed.

Revision surgery is often more complex than first-time implantation because previous surgery can alter tissue planes and produce fibrosis. Previous infection, explantation or repeated revision can further increase reconstructive complexity.

Mechanical failure Loss of rigidity Pump problems Cylinder position Reservoir problems Pain Infection Erosion Previous explant Corporal fibrosis
!

Some postoperative implant concerns require prompt assessment

Increasing pain, increasing redness or swelling, fever, wound discharge, skin breakdown or exposure of any implant component should be assessed promptly. Do not delay urgent medical care while arranging a routine or interstate appointment.

Life with an implant

The treatment decision is about more than device mechanics

Reliability, concealability, spontaneity, confidence, partner expectations and comfort operating the device all form part of the real-life discussion.

Some patients focus primarily on obtaining predictable rigidity after years of unsuccessful ED treatment. Others have specific questions about appearance, what a partner may notice, glans firmness, sensation or returning to physical activity.

Couple together representing quality of life and intimacy after erectile dysfunction treatment
Dr Jack Crozier consulting with a patient in Brisbane
Specialist care

Dr Jack Crozier

Dr Jack Crozier is a Brisbane urologist and fellowship-trained andrologist whose subspecialty practice includes erectile dysfunction, penile implant surgery, Peyronie’s disease and reconstructive andrology.

His advanced andrology fellowship experience at University College London Hospitals included penile prosthetic surgery, penile reconstruction, Peyronie’s disease surgery and complex andrology.

This allows erectile function, penile anatomy, deformity, fibrosis, previous surgery and potential future revision requirements to be considered as part of the same treatment discussion.

FRACS Urology
Advanced Fellowship Andrology · UCLH
Consultant Urologist Princess Alexandra Hospital
Subspecialty Practice Prosthetic & reconstructive andrology
Regional · Interstate · International

Travelling to Brisbane for penile implant surgery?

Patients may seek penile prosthetic assessment from regional Queensland, interstate or overseas for first-time implantation, ED after prostatectomy, Peyronie’s disease with erectile dysfunction, previous implant problems or complex revision surgery.

Where clinically appropriate, existing records can be useful before major travel arrangements are made.

  • Previous urology correspondence
  • Pelvic or penile operation reports
  • Previous implant identification information
  • Imaging and relevant investigation results
  • Previous infection or implant removal history
Air travel to Brisbane for specialist penile implant assessment

Major travel arrangements are best considered once the likely assessment and treatment pathway is clearer.

Patient education

Explore penile implant information in more detail

These dedicated guides address the practical questions patients commonly ask before and after penile implant surgery.

Frequently asked questions

Penile implant surgery FAQs

Implant surgery may be worth discussing when erectile dysfunction remains a significant problem despite other reasonable treatment, when other treatments are unsuitable or when you are considering a surgical option after appropriate counselling. Assessment should review the cause of ED, previous treatment, health conditions, penile anatomy and expectations.

No. Previous tablet response is only one part of assessment. Other treatment options may remain relevant depending on the underlying cause, severity, previous treatment and individual priorities.

Effectiveness is only one consideration. Pain, inconvenience, dislike of needles, reliability, spontaneity and individual preference can all influence whether injection therapy remains acceptable.

Penile implant surgery can be considered in appropriately selected men with persistent erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy. Previous pelvic surgery is relevant because it can influence anatomy and operative planning.

There is no single implant design that is best for every patient. Hand function, anatomy, scarring, previous pelvic or penile surgery and individual priorities should be considered when discussing inflatable and malleable options.

A penile implant is designed to create rigidity rather than increase penile length. Long-standing ED, prostate treatment, Peyronie’s disease and fibrosis may already have affected dimensions before surgery. Implant sizing is based on the available internal corporal dimensions measured during the operation.

The implant is designed to provide penile rigidity. It does not itself create sexual desire, sensation or orgasm. Other conditions, previous surgery and medications can independently affect these aspects of sexual function.

The implant cylinders principally provide rigidity within the penile shaft. The glans is anatomically separate and continues to depend on remaining natural blood flow and arousal for engorgement. Some patients therefore notice that the glans remains softer than the implanted shaft.

In selected men with significant ED and Peyronie’s disease, implant surgery can form part of a pathway addressing rigidity and penile deformity together. Implant placement may improve some curvature, while additional straightening or reconstructive techniques may occasionally be required.

There is no fixed lifespan that applies to every implant. Penile implants are mechanical devices and can function for many years, but mechanical failure or another complication can eventually require revision, replacement or removal.

The implant should first be assessed to determine whether the problem relates to device operation, pump position, a mechanical component, fluid loss, cylinder position or another issue. Revision surgery is a separate clinical pathway from first-time implantation.

Increasing pain, redness, rapidly increasing swelling, fever, wound discharge, skin breakdown or exposure of any implant component warrant prompt medical assessment. A significant new change in implant position or function should also be reviewed.

Yes. Problems with an implant inserted elsewhere can be assessed. If available, bring implant identification information, the original operation report, details of previous revision surgery and records relating to previous infection or implant removal.

Where clinically appropriate, previous records and implant information may help clarify what further assessment is required before major travel arrangements are made. An in-person examination is still necessary for many aspects of definitive surgical planning.

Penile Implant Assessment · Brisbane

Considering penile implant surgery?

A specialist consultation can help clarify whether implant surgery is appropriate, how previous erectile dysfunction treatment, prostate surgery or penile anatomy may influence the operation, and which questions should be addressed before making a decision.

Medical information disclaimer: This page provides general educational information only and does not provide individual medical advice, diagnosis or a treatment recommendation. Penile implant surgery involves an implanted medical device and has potential benefits, limitations and risks. Appropriate treatment, implant design, surgical technique and postoperative care depend on individual medical history, anatomy, previous treatment, examination findings and informed patient preferences. Product availability, specifications and regulatory information can change. Individual device information should be discussed with an appropriately qualified clinician as part of informed consent. Seek prompt medical assessment for significant postoperative pain, fever, increasing redness or swelling, wound discharge, skin breakdown or exposure of an implant component.

Explore More About Penile Implant Surgery

Penile Implant Revision Surgery
Problems with an existing penile implant, including mechanical failure, positioning concerns, infection, erosion or previous implant surgery.